Western leaders visit Kyiv and pledge military support against Russia on war’s 3rd anniversary

Western leaders visit Kyiv and pledge military support against Russia on war’s 3rd anniversary
Alexander Stubb, Volodymyr Zelensky, Edgars Rinkevics, Antonio Costa, Ursula von der Leyen, Mette Frederiksen, Kristrun Frostadottir and Pedro Sanchez in Kyiv, Ukraine, Feb. 24, 2025. (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 25 February 2025
Follow

Western leaders visit Kyiv and pledge military support against Russia on war’s 3rd anniversary

Western leaders visit Kyiv and pledge military support against Russia on war’s 3rd anniversary
  • Three-year milestone drew more than a dozen Western leaders to Kyiv for commemorative events in a conspicuous show of support
  • Putin’s troops are making steady progress on the battlefield while Ukraine is grappling with shortages of troops and weapons

KYIV, Ukraine: Ukraine on Monday marked the bleakest anniversary yet of its war against the Russia invasion, with the country’s forces under severe pressure on the battlefield and US President Donald Trump’s administration apparently embracing the Kremlin in a reversal of US policy.
The three-year milestone drew more than a dozen Western leaders to Kyiv for commemorative events in a conspicuous show of support. They warned of the war’s wider implications for global security and vowed to keep providing billions of dollars in support for Ukraine as uncertainty deepens over the US commitment to help. Washington did not send any senior official to the occasion.
The fourth year of fighting could be pivotal as Trump uses his return to office to press for a peace deal.
“The autocrats around the world are watching very carefully whether there’s any impunity if you violate international borders or invade your neighbor, or if there is true deterrence,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen warned.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau echoed that sentiment. Canadians, he said, “believe deeply that it’s not just about Ukraine. It’s about the rules and the values and the principles of sovereignty, of independence, territorial integrity that protects every country in the world. All of us rely on those rules to be able to build peace and security.”
Some observers say Russian success in Ukraine could embolden China’s ambitions. Just as Moscow claims that Ukraine is rightfully Russian territory, China claims the self-governing island of Taiwan as its own. North Korea and Iran have also aided Russia’s war effort.
In a cascade of unwelcome developments for Kyiv, Trump has in recent days called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky a dictator, suggested Ukraine is to blame for the war and ended Russian President Vladimir Putin’s three-year diplomatic isolation by the United States. US officials have also indicated to Ukraine that its hopes of joining NATO are unlikely to be realized and that it probably won’t get back the land that Russia’s army occupies, which amounts to nearly 20 percent of the country.
Meanwhile, Putin’s troops are making steady progress on the battlefield while Ukraine is grappling with shortages of troops and weapons.
The guests in Kyiv and the leaders appearing by video had similar messages: Ukraine and its European partners must be consulted in any peace negotiations, Putin’s ambitions must be thwarted, and Europe must take on more of the burden for its own defense.

The shift in Washington’s policy has set off alarm bells in Europe, where governments fear being sidelined by the US in efforts to secure a peace deal. They are mulling how they might pick up the slack of any cut in US aid for Ukraine. The changes have also placed strain on transatlantic relations.
European Council President Antonio Costa on Sunday announced that he would convene an emergency summit of the 27 EU leaders in Brussels on March 6, with Ukraine at the top of the agenda.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron are both visiting Washington this week.
EU foreign ministers on Monday approved a new raft of sanctions against Russia. The measures target Russia’s so-called “shadow fleet” of ships that it uses to skirt restrictions on transporting oil and gas, or to carry stolen Ukrainian grain. The EU said 74 vessels were added to its shadow fleet list.
Asset freezes and travel bans were imposed on 83 officials and “entities” — usually government agencies, banks or companies.
Britain, too, imposed new sanctions, targeting 107 businesses and individuals in what it says is its biggest package targeting Russia’s war machine since the early days of the conflict in 2022.
The measures take aim at Russia’s military supply chains, including companies in several countries — notably China — that Britain says are supplying machine tools, electronics and dual-use goods for Russia’s military.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said his country would provide a 1 billion-euro ($1.04 billion) military systems package to Ukraine this year.
Starmer said Ukrainians’ voices “must be at the heart of the drive for peace,” while Trump’s intervention had “changed the global conversation” and “created an opportunity.”
“Russia does not hold all the cards in this war,” he said.
Coming off a victory in Sunday’s German elections, conservative leader Friedrich Merz — also a staunch backer of Ukraine — posted on X Monday: “More than ever, we must put Ukraine in a position of strength.”
“For a fair peace, the country that is under attack must be part of peace negotiations,” he wrote.
Diplomacy ramps up after record Russian drone attack
On Sunday, Russia launched its biggest single drone attack of the war, pounding Ukraine with 267 drones.
The EU’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, insisted that the US cannot seal any peace deal to end the war without Ukraine or Europe being involved. She highlighted what she claimed were pro-Russian positions being taken up by the Trump administration.
“You can discuss whatever you want with Putin. But if it comes to Europe or Ukraine, then Ukraine and Europe also have to agree to this deal,” Kallas told reporters in Brussels, where she was leading a meeting of EU foreign ministers.
Kallas is scheduled to travel to Washington on Tuesday for talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres said the third anniversary was “a grim milestone.”
“More than 12,600 civilians killed, with many more injured. Entire communities reduced to rubble. Hospitals and schools destroyed,” he said in Geneva.
In a win for Ukraine, the United States on Monday failed to get the UN General Assembly to approve its resolution seeking to end the war without mentioning Russian aggression. The US draft resolution was amended by the assembly to add language making clear that Russia invaded its smaller neighbor in violation of the UN Charter.

In other developments, Trump said Putin would accept European peacekeepers in Ukraine as part of a potential deal to end the war.
“Yeah, he will accept it,” Trump told reporters at the White House. “I have asked him that question. Look, if we do this deal, he’s not looking for more war.”
Putin has previously said that European or US forces in Ukraine would be a major security issue for Russia. He has never publicly indicated that he would accept Western troops in Ukraine, and multiple Russian officials have indicated that would be a red line for Moscow.
Russia’s foreign ministry said Saturday that preparations for a face-to-face meeting between Trump and Putin were underway, and US officials have said that they agreed with Moscow to reestablish diplomatic ties and restart economic cooperation.
At a virtual meeting with leaders of the Group of Seven economies also held Monday, Zelensky said Ukraine and the US are “working productively” on an economic agreement that would help lock them together. Trump attended the meeting.
“And, President Trump, we would really like to hear from you because all our people, all our families, are very worried. Will there be support from America? Will America be the leader of the free world?” Zelensky said.


Judge rejects immediately restoring AP’s access to White House but urges government to reconsider

Judge rejects immediately restoring AP’s access to White House but urges government to reconsider
Updated 8 min 16 sec ago
Follow

Judge rejects immediately restoring AP’s access to White House but urges government to reconsider

Judge rejects immediately restoring AP’s access to White House but urges government to reconsider
  • The AP says it is adhering to the “Gulf of Mexico” terminology because its audience is global and the waters are not only in US territory, but it is acknowledging Trump’s rechristening as well

WASHINGTON: A federal judge on Monday refused to immediately order the White House to restore The Associated Press’ access to presidential events, saying the news organization had not demonstrated it had suffered any irreparable harm. But he urged the Trump administration to reconsider its two-week-old ban, saying that case law “is uniformly unhelpful to the White House.”
US District Judge Trevor N. McFadden’s decision was only for the moment, however. He told attorneys for the Trump administration and the AP that the issue required more exploration before ruling.
McFadden peppered both sides with questions during arguments over a lawsuit the AP filed Friday saying that its First Amendment rights were being violated by the ban, which began gradually two weeks ago. President Donald Trump said it was punishment for the agency’s decision not to entirely follow his executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.”
McFadden, discussing the composition of the “press pool” that is chosen by the White House Correspondents’ Association, questioned why the government was obligated to follow those choices. “It feels a little odd that the White House is somehow bound by the decisions this private organization is making,” the judge told AP attorneys.
He also questioned AP’s noting of its longtime membership in the White House press pool. “Is this administration somehow bound by what happened with President McKinley?” the judge asked. But he noted that the correspondents’ group had been tasked by the White House to choose the members of its pool.
“The White House has accepted the correspondents’ association to be the referee here, and has just discriminated against one organization. That does seem problematic,” McFadden said in an exchange with government attorney Brian Hudak.
Later, McFadden warned the government’s attorney to reconsider its position, saying “case law in this circuit is uniformly unhelpful to the White House.”
The AP says it is adhering to the “Gulf of Mexico” terminology because its audience is global and the waters are not only in US territory, but it is acknowledging Trump’s rechristening as well.
AP says the issue strikes at the very core of the US Constitution’s First Amendment, which bars the government from punishing speech. The White House says access to the president is a privilege, not a right.
Earlier this month, the Trump administration began barring the AP from the Oval Office, Air Force One and other areas that have been open to the agency for a century as part of the White House press pool. The dispute stems from AP’s refusal to change its style in referring to the Gulf of Mexico, which Trump decreed the “Gulf of America” via an executive order.
The AP named three Trump officials – White House chief of staff Susan Wiles, deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich and press secretary Karoline Leavitt – as defendants. The agency, a nonprofit news outlet in operation since 1846, called the White House’s move a “targeted attack” of the sort barred by the First Amendment.
“The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government,” the AP said in its lawsuit.
The White House says its move to restrict AP is not an infringement of free-speech rights. “The only person who has the absolute right to occupy those spaces is the president of the United States,” Wiles wrote to Julie Pace, AP’s executive editor, in an email included in the agency’s lawsuit. “For the rest of us, it’s a privilege, and to suggest otherwise is wrong.”

 


Algerian TikTok influencer convicted in France for inciting terrorism

This photograph shows a police car in Paris, on March 29, 2024. (AFP)
This photograph shows a police car in Paris, on March 29, 2024. (AFP)
Updated 21 min 13 sec ago
Follow

Algerian TikTok influencer convicted in France for inciting terrorism

This photograph shows a police car in Paris, on March 29, 2024. (AFP)
  • TikTok has said it banned the account from which the video was uploaded, for posting several videos that broke its rules on hate speech

BREST, France: A French court on Monday found an Algerian online influencer guilty of inciting terrorism on TikTok, sentencing him to 18 months in jail.
The 25-year-old man, identified by officials as Youcef A. and known on social media as Zazou Youssef, had been charged in the western city of Brest with “advocating an act of terrorism” on the platform.
Prosecutor Camille Miansoni had recommended a prison sentence of two years for the charge that is punishable by up to seven years.
Youssef appeared in a video posted on the popular platform on December 31 calling for attacks in France and violence in Algeria.
The police prefect in France’s western Finistere region, Alain Espinasse, ordered a judicial investigation after officers made him aware of the video.
According to authorities, Youssef had been living in France on a temporary residency permit and had appealed against a previous sentence for vandalism during riots in 2023.
In addition to the jail term, the court said Youssef could not reside in France for 10 years.
TikTok has said it banned the account from which the video was uploaded, for posting several videos that broke its rules on hate speech.
 

 


EU and Israel resume dialogue with focus on Gaza’s future

EU and Israel resume dialogue with focus on Gaza’s future
Updated 24 February 2025
Follow

EU and Israel resume dialogue with focus on Gaza’s future

EU and Israel resume dialogue with focus on Gaza’s future
  • Saar will co-chair a meeting of the EU-Israel Association Council with EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas in the first such session since 2022

BRUSSELS: Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called for a constructive dialogue but braced for criticism from some European countries as he arrived for talks on Monday in Brussels.

The Israeli minister is meeting senior European officials, reviving a dialogue with the EU as the bloc considers a role in the reconstruction of Gaza following last month’s fragile ceasefire deal.

“I’m looking for a constructive dialogue, an open and honest one, and I believe that this is what it will be,” Saar told reporters on arrival.

“We know how to face criticism,” he said, adding: “It’s okay as long as the criticism is not connected to delegitimization, demonization, or double standards ... but we are ready to discuss everything with an open mind.”

Saar will co-chair a meeting of the EU-Israel Association Council with EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas in the first such session since 2022. 

Talks focus on the humanitarian situation in Gaza, Israeli-Palestinian relations, and changing regional dynamics.

The Israeli foreign minister said that within the EU, “there are very friendly countries, and there are less friendly countries,” but Monday’s meeting showed a willingness to renew normal relations.

The attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, and Israel’s response exposed sharp divisions within the EU. 

While all members condemned the Hamas attacks, some staunchly defended Israel’s war in Gaza and others condemned Israel’s military campaign and its toll on civilians.

In February 2024, the leaders of Spain and Ireland sent a letter to the European Commission asking for a review of whether Israel was complying with its human rights obligations under the 2000 EU-Israel Association Agreement, which provides the basis for political and economic cooperation between the two sides.

But ahead of Monday’s meeting, the bloc’s 27 member countries negotiated a compromise position that praises areas of cooperation with Israel while also raising concerns.

At the meeting, the EU will emphasize both Europe’s commitment to Israel’s security and its view that “displaced Gazans should be ensured a safe and dignified return to their homes in Gaza,” according to a draft document seen by Reuters.

The Israeli offensive has killed at least 48,000 people, Palestinian health authorities say, leaving some hundreds of thousands of people in makeshift shelters and dependent on aid trucks.


Macron, Trump vow to work together on Ukraine, despite differences

Macron, Trump vow to work together on Ukraine, despite differences
Updated 24 February 2025
Follow

Macron, Trump vow to work together on Ukraine, despite differences

Macron, Trump vow to work together on Ukraine, despite differences
  • Emmanuel Macron is representing the European Union as a whole during his visit
  • French leader aims to persuade Trump to continue some US support for Ukraine

WASHINGTON: French President Emmanuel Macron and Donald Trump sought to smooth over a transatlantic rift on Ukraine Monday, with the US president eyeing a deal to end Russia’s invasion “within weeks” backed by European peacekeepers.
Hosting Macron at the White House on the third anniversary of the Russian invasion, Trump also said he expected Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky to visit this week or next, to sign a deal giving Washington access to Kyiv’s minerals.
Trump hailed Macron as a “very special man” as they shared one of their trademark macho handshakes in the Oval Office — with the French president seeking to use his ties with Trump to shore up support for Ukraine.
“I think we could end it within weeks — if we’re smart. If we’re not smart, it will keep going,” Trump said.
The US president added that Russian President Vladimir Putin was ready to “accept” European troops deployed in Ukraine as guarantors of a deal to end fighting.
Macron said that both leaders wanted a “solid long lasting peace,” proclaimed that Europe was ready to “step up” defense spending and reiterated that Europe was ready to deploy peacekeepers.
But he said he wanted “strong” US involvement in any such plan.
Both Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer — who is visiting the White House on Thursday — have said their countries are ready to contribute peacekeeping troops in Ukraine if there is a deal.

The friendly tone of the Oval Office meeting came despite many European nations fearing that Trump’s recent embrace of Russian talking points on Ukraine could herald the end of the 80-year-old transatlantic alliance.
Trump sent shock waves around the world when he declared his readiness to resume diplomacy with Russia and to hold talks about the future of Ukraine without the involvement of European allies or Kyiv.
It sent European leaders beating a path to Trump’s door, led by Macron. The two leaders earlier Monday dialed in together from the Oval Office to a call with the heads of the G7 leading economies and Zelensky.
The French president last week said he would tell the Republican: “You cannot be weak in the face of President Putin.”
Trump had hit back last Friday saying that both Macron and Starmer — the leaders of Europe’s two nuclear powers — had done “nothing” to try to end the Ukraine war over the past three years.
In recent days Macron has tried to coordinate a European response to Washington’s sudden policy shift.
At their meeting, the French leader would present his “proposals for action” to counter the “Russian threat,” an adviser to the president said. They will also hold a joint press conference.
Macron is representing the European Union as a whole during his visit, after meeting leaders across the continent, including Moscow-friendly Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, the presidential adviser said.
The French leader aims to persuade Trump to continue some US support for Ukraine, respecting its sovereignty.

Macron and Starmer, who will visit Trump on Thursday, coordinated on messaging prior to the French president’s departure for the United States this weekend.
Britain and France have also discussed the deployment of European forces in Ukraine after a peace agreement is reached to deter Russia from future attacks.
“The idea is to deploy soldiers to a second line, not on the front line. This could be combined with a multinational operation, with non-European contingents,” said a French source close to the discussions.
Macron and Starmer are expected to ask Trump to provide “solid security guarantees” for the deployed forces, and possibly logistics or intelligence.
US National Security Adviser Mike Waltz told reporters on Monday that “we expect to talk quite a bit about the security guarantees that Macron has put on the table.”
Trump and Macron would also discuss the thorny issue of trade with the European Union, with the US president threatening sweeping tariffs against the bloc, said Waltz.


UN General Assembly backs EU over US in rival resolutions calling for end to war in Ukraine

UN General Assembly backs EU over US in rival resolutions calling for end to war in Ukraine
Updated 34 min 6 sec ago
Follow

UN General Assembly backs EU over US in rival resolutions calling for end to war in Ukraine

UN General Assembly backs EU over US in rival resolutions calling for end to war in Ukraine
  • US resolution passes only after amendment, proposed by France, adds mention of Russia’s aggression
  • Gulf countries abstain from the vote, saying they want to prioritize dialogue in efforts to end the conflict

NEW YORK CITY: The UN General Assembly on Monday passed a resolution, backed by the EU and Ukraine, condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, demanding the immediate withdrawal of Russian troops, and calling for a quick end to hostilities and a peaceful resolution to the war.

The resolution passed with 93 votes in favor. The US and Russia were two of 18 UN members who voted against it, and 65 countries, including China and Gulf Cooperation Council member states, abstained. All other Arab countries also abstained, with the exception of Lebanon, which voted in favor.

The resolution reaffirms the assembly’s commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and to the principle “that no territorial acquisition resulting from the threat or use of force shall be recognized as legal.”

It calls for “a deescalation, an early cessation of hostilities and a peaceful resolution of the war against Ukraine” and reiterated “the urgent need to end the war this year.”

Over the weekend, the US had urged countries to vote against the Ukrainian resolution. On Friday, Washington proposed its own, last-minute, very brief rival resolution that acknowledged “the tragic loss of life throughout the Russia-Ukraine conflict,” implored “a swift end to the conflict” and further urged efforts to achieve “a lasting peace between Ukraine and Russia.” It stopped short of mentioning Russian aggression.

The US resolution was only passed by the General Assembly after an amendment, proposed by France, that made it clear Russia had invaded its smaller neighbor in violation of the UN Charter.

The vote on the amended US resolution passed with 93 votes in favor and eight against. There were 73 abstentions, including the US, which abstained from the final vote on its own resolution.

US envoy Dorothy Shea said several previous UN resolutions condemning Russia and demanding the withdrawal of Russian troops “have failed to stop the war,” which “has now dragged on for far too long and at far too terrible a cost to the people in Ukraine and Russia and beyond.”

She added: “What we need is a resolution marking the commitment from all UN member states to bring a durable end to the war.”

Ukraine’s deputy foreign minister, Mariana Betsa, called for “all nations to stand firm and to take (the) side of the (UN) Charter, the side of humanity and the side of just and lasting peace, peace through strength.”

She added: “This war has never been about Ukraine only; it is about the fundamental right of any country to exist, to choose its own path and to live free from aggression.”

Speaking on behalf of the Gulf Cooperation Council after the vote, Kuwait’s permanent representative to the UN, Tarek Al-Banai, told the assembly that GCC members abstained in order to give priority to dialogue, and expressed the council’s commitment to resolving the conflict in Ukraine as quickly as possible.

Al-Banai said that for the past three years, GCC member countries have assumed the role of mediators, which helped facilitate the release of hostages through negotiations. He also expressed hope that the talks between Russia and the US in Riyadh last week will prove to be the first step toward resolving the conflict.

He vowed that the GCC will continue its efforts to pursue “serious solutions that will make it possible to stop the bloodshed and put an end, once and for all, to the conflict.”